While the employment requirement gives the employer the power to take legal action in the event of a violation on the part of the worker, this agreement can be challenged at the same time under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act. This provision of the Indian Contract Act prohibits any agreement to restrict fair trade and legal professions. If an agreement directly or indirectly excludes someone from a fair trade and a legal profession, it is in nullity, if it is this section. Article 19, paragraph 1, point g)  of the Indian Constitution also recognizes the right to practice a legitimate profession, trade and trade. For a job loan to be valid in India, it must not be contrary to the above provisions and must be reasonable in nature. There should be freedom of trade and fair practices with respect to legally valid occupations. The 1976 law prohibits forced labour. No one should be required to stay in a company for a specific mandate. There is a need to discuss the necessity and applicability of personnel obligations under Indian law. It is important to ensure that the period of application of the loan is not too long and that the amount of this repayment is not greater than the actual amount that the employer spends on the training of the worker.
In order to complete a valid employment loan, the parties must ensure that the following conditions are met: (i) the agreement must be signed by the parties with free consent; (ii) conditions must be appropriate; and (iii) the conditions imposed on the worker must be proven in order to protect the interests of the employer. In addition, the employment loan, which sets out the conditions that can necessarily serve the employer for a certain period of time, or a penalty for the arrival of expenses in the nature of the loan of compensation, and therefore, such a type of employment loan must be executed on a stamp paper of appropriate value to be valid and enforceable.3 Sir, please help my company made a 4-year loan in which they said that if I left the business there there When I was 4 years old, I`ll have to pay 1.5 rupee lakh, they`ve already taken the autographed check. I worked in the company for 2 years and 3 months, during which they did incrementally only once, did not even give a train to me (by which they spent money for my training) Now, if I go away without notice, they say they will deposit this check of 1.5 lakh. Please help me. Good morning, sir. I`m from Tamilnadu. I worked in a private company with obligations that work for 4 years and with 3 months notice. As according to the borrowing rules, In case of a break in the loan, I had to pay an amount of 2lakhs. I finished the service for 3 years and 4 months, and I feel that there is no more professional growth here. So I thought about resigning this job. But the management asks me to pay 2lakhs, even after I have worked there for 3 years or more.
Even they ask for another Rs.34000 for notice and does not allow me to work for The Notice which says I had a loss of salary in the previous period. They also have my original sheets on them and ask me to pay the amount to recover the original certificates. Please give me some legal advice to get rid of this problem, sir… !!! In light of the above discussions and the various court decisions, the employment obligation is considered appropriate because it is necessary to protect the interests of the employer. However, the restrictions imposed on the worker in that contract should be “reasonable” and “necessary” to protect the employer`s interests, otherwise the validity of the loan may be called into question. Workers are always free to decide on their jobs and cannot be forced to work for an employer by imposing a commitment to employment.